Wednesday, July 31, 2019

176. Notes - draft and questions


176. 31 July 2019

       Mid-afternoon. You are at the south end of Heritage Park facing the depth woods on the west with the practice soccer fields behind you. Carol is reading early on in The House of Secrets by Brad Meltzer. The purpose of this exercise of reading over material that relates to metaphysics and science and souls is to allow Ms Havisham to have a say on human interpretations of such. Do you have a comment before we begin, Ms Havisham? - Amorella

       Note: Ms Havisham's commentary below is slightly edited and further clarified and in tomorrow's Note 177. Consider this a first draft. - Amorella

       Long ago human beings incorporated words to better describe their feelings on personally observed feelings and events, some circumstances were in a spiritual twist. Out of a variety of seemingly, at first, supernatural events there arose reasoning for explanation, i.e. stories. 

       Gods and Goddesses in control with ghosts and goblins closer to the earthlings themselves. What could be closer than the human heartanmind in an imaginary twist along with the spiritual? Witnessing a seemingly supernatural (out of the ordinary) event comes first. As no earthling arrives and survives in a vacuum, culture, conjecture and belief were in a general reply to the relatively unseen, although felt, spiritual. 

       Why? Because the sense of the spiritual is embedded within the human psyche. It is embedded in the human emotional heart and intellectual mind because of the soul; one of which I, Ms Havisham, am (within linguistic personification of course). 

       People feel their own souls from time to time, one usual observation witnessed is that the speaker, generally with an unannounced tear in the eye, slightly bows her or his head in anguish or delight and implies or says something such: "I have no words." 
       This is not science, this is human. When people feel they are stringently aware of their own soul’s consciousness flounders in the mystery of how this can be, that they cannot speak without hesitation or not at all in such a highly intimate moment of self-reckoning. 

       The soul bursts forth within a sacred solitude of understanding an immediate truth. The material world and the spiritual are forever married while in a living quantum-like thinking consciousness of being and not-being at the same time. This is not a miracle, it is an existence of self and other existing selves in the physical world.

       Quantum-like thinking is not science. Thought cannot be measured except within its grammar and vocabulary. Human consciousness exists to convey thought. Animals also have a consciousness that cannot be fully measured. Reasoned thought is a spiritual substance. Without it, one cannot know what or who she or he is. In here, in this blog story, this is a greater philosophical truth as a soul such as myself sees and understands it. 

       You do not have to agree. You have not been a soul whole and empty, you humans are heart and mind. You name things. You have grammar and subjects and predicates. You name yourselves and persons and places and things and being. 

       The closest thing a soul is is to be named, in science-like fashion, is the working pronoun, "I". If you want to imagine this twist-in-a-spirit, name yourself 'I' and see the spiritual world more like I see myself. 

       Imagine the consciousness of being a pronoun not a noun, verb, adjective, adverb, preposition, conjunction or interjection. - mh

       Ms Havisham in five hundred words or less. Hey, orndorff, what do you think of that? - Amorella

       1726 hours. Four hundred and sixty-four words according to a Microsoft word count. That's the science. The thought -- much of it is between the lines, invisible and unmeasurable. I have not thought on thought being spiritual in and of itself because words used reasonably have to take me there. Thought may be seen spiritual in design but thought is not sacred. In fact, thought can be downright profane. 

       Post. - Amorella

Tuesday, July 30, 2019

175. Notes - ready for Ms Havisham and 'Consciousness'


175. 30 July 2019

         Afternoon. Carol is taking a nap with Jadah slumbering on Carol's belly. It has been a lazy day. You took an hour nap earlier. Last night you watched Ladies in Lavender of good film of art film quality on Prime. -- A bit later, you had lunch at Five Guys and now you are at Heritage Park in the shade facing east and the practice soccer field. Carol is taking her walk.  - Amorella

         1622 hours. Lucked out and filled up the Avalon at two-twenty-nine a gallon at UDF; three days ago, it was two-ninety-five a gallon most everywhere in the area. The best part was that the car got 44.5 miles per gallon. Awesome. 

         You have been attached to getting good car mileage since 1965. You consider it as an obsession but to you it really is a practicality where once it was a necessity. mh

         Let's return to editing the Wikipedia 'Consciousness' article. - Amorella

         1648 hours. Fine with me. I like this stuff. Lots of things to wonder on. 

         We have further edited the 'Consciousness' article to 7 pages with 1981 words. This is the material Ms Havisham will comment on to give you more insight as to how she, as a personified soul, perceives and interprets human cognation. Add. - Amorella


** **

Consciousness
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is about cognition.

Consciousness is the state or quality of awareness or of being aware of an external object or something within oneself.

It has been defined variously in terms of sentience, awareness, qualia, subjectivity, the ability to experience or to  feel, wakefulness, having a sense of selfhood or soul,
the fact that there is something "that it is like" to "have" or "be" it, and the executive control system of the mind. 

Despite the difficulty in definition, many philosophers believe that there is a broadly shared underlying intuition about what consciousness is. As Max Velmans and Susan Schneider wrote in The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness: 

"Anything that we are aware of at a given moment forms part of our consciousness, making conscious experience at once the most familiar and most mysterious aspect of our lives." 

You become aware that your actions have an effect on other people. Western philosophers, since the time of Descartes and Locke, have struggled to comprehend the nature of consciousness and identify its essential properties.

 Issues of concern in the philosophy of consciousness include whether the concept is fundamentally coherent; whether consciousness can ever be explained mechanistically; whether non-human consciousness exists and if so how it can be recognized; how consciousness relates to language; whether consciousness can be understood in a way that does not require a dualistic distinction between mental and physical states or properties; and whether it may ever be possible for computing machines like computers or robots to be conscious, a topic studied in the field of artificial intelligence.

Thanks to developments in technology over the past few decades, consciousness has become a significant topic of interdisciplinary research in cognitive science, with significant contributions from fields such as psychology, anthropology, neuropsychology and neuroscience. The primary focus is on understanding what it means biologically and psychologically for information to be present in consciousness—that is, on determining the neural and psychological correlates of consciousness.

The majority of experimental studies assess consciousness in humans by asking subjects for a verbal report of their experiences (e.g., "tell me if you notice anything when I do this").

Issues of interest include phenomena such as subliminal perception, blindsight, denial of impairment, and altered states of consciousness produced by alcohol and other drugs, or spiritual or meditative techniques.

In medicine, consciousness is assessed by observing a patient's arousal and responsiveness, and can be seen as a continuum of states ranging from full alertness and comprehension, through disorientation, delirium, loss of meaningful communication, and finally loss of movement in response to painful stimuli Issues of practical concern include how the presence of consciousness can be assessed in severely ill, comatose, or anesthetized people, and how to treat conditions in which consciousness is impaired or disrupted. 

The degree of consciousness is measured by standardized behavior observation scales such as the Glasgow Coma Scale.

Etymology

The origin of the modern concept of consciousness is often attributed to John Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding, published in 1690. Locke defined consciousness as "the perception of what passes in a man's own mind". His essay influenced the 18th-century view of consciousness, and his definition appeared in Samuel Johnson's celebrated Dictionary (1755)

"Consciousness" (French: conscience) is also defined in the 1753 volume of Diderot and d'Alembert's Encyclopédie, as "the opinion or internal feeling that we ourselves have from what we do"
. . .

Philosophy of mind

The philosophy of mind has given rise to many stances regarding consciousness. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy in 1998 defines consciousness as follows:

Consciousness—Philosophers have used the term 'consciousness' for four main topics: knowledge in general, intentionality, introspection (and the knowledge it specifically generates) and phenomenal experience... Something within one's mind is 'introspectively conscious' just in case one introspects it (or is poised to do so). Introspection is often thought to deliver one's primary knowledge of one's mental life. 

An experience or other mental entity is 'phenomenally conscious' just in case there is 'something it is like' for one to have it. The clearest examples are: perceptual experience, such as tasting and seeing; bodily-sensational experiences, such as those of pains, tickles and itches; imaginative experiences, such as those of one's own actions or perceptions; and streams of thought, as in the experience of thinking 'in words' or 'in images'. 

Introspection and phenomenality seem independent, or dissociable, although this is controversial. 

In a more skeptical definition of consciousness, Stuart Sutherland has exemplified some of the difficulties in fully ascertaining all of its cognate meanings in his entry for the 1989 version of the Macmillan Dictionary of Psychology:

Consciousness—The having of perceptions, thoughts, and feelings; awareness. The term is impossible to define except in terms that are unintelligible without a grasp of what consciousness means. 
. . .

The coherence of the concept

Philosophers and non-philosophers differ in their intuitions about what consciousness is. While most people have a strong intuition for the existence of what they refer to as consciousness skeptics argue that this intuition is false, either because the concept of consciousness is intrinsically incoherent, or because our intuitions about it are based in illusions.  

Gilbert Ryle, for example, argued that traditional understanding of consciousness depends on a Cartesian dualist outlook that improperly distinguishes between mind and body, or between mind and world. He proposed that we speak not of minds, bodies, and the world, but of individuals, or persons, acting in the world. 

Thus, by speaking of "consciousness" we end up misleading ourselves by thinking that there is any sort of thing as consciousness separated from behavioral and linguistic understandings.

More generally, many philosophers and scientists have been unhappy about the difficulty of producing a definition that does not involve circularity or fuzziness. 
. . .

Problem of other minds

Many philosophers consider experience to be the essence of consciousness, and believe that experience can only fully be known from the inside, subjectively.

But if consciousness is subjective and not visible from the outside, why do the vast majority of people believe that other people are conscious, but rocks and trees are not?  This is called the problem of other minds.

It is particularly acute for people who believe in the possibility of philosophical zombies, that is, people who think it is possible in principle to have an entity that is physically indistinguishable from a human being and behaves like a human being in every way but nevertheless lacks consciousness. . .. 

A more straightforward way of saying this is that we attribute experiences to people because of what they can do, including the fact that they can tell us about their experiences. 

Animal consciousness

The topic of animal consciousness is beset by a number of difficulties. It poses the problem of other minds in an especially severe form, because non-human animals, lacking the ability to express human language, cannot tell us about their experiences. . ..

Most people have a strong intuition that some animals, such as cats and dogs, are conscious, while others, such as insects, are not; but the sources of this intuition are not obvious, and are often based on personal interactions with pets and other animals they have observed. 
Philosophers who consider subjective experience the essence of consciousness also generally believe, as a correlate, that the existence and nature of animal consciousness can never rigorously be known. . .. 

On July 7, 2012, eminent scientists from different branches of neuroscience gathered at the University of Cambridge to celebrate the Francis Crick Memorial Conference, which deals with consciousness in humans and pre-linguistic consciousness in nonhuman animals. After the conference, they signed in the presence of Stephen Hawking, the 'Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness', which summarizes the most important findings of the survey:

"We decided to reach a consensus and make a statement directed to the public that is not scientific. It's obvious to everyone in this room that animals have consciousness, but it is not obvious to the rest of the world. It is not obvious to the rest of the Western world or the Far East. It is not obvious to the society." 

"Convergent evidence indicates that non-human animals [...], including all mammals and birds, and other creatures, [...] have the necessary neural substrates of consciousness and the capacity to exhibit intentional behaviors."
 . . .

Artifact consciousness

The idea of an artifact made conscious is an ancient theme of mythology, appearing for example in the Greek myth of Pygmalion, who carved a statue that was magically brought to life, and in medieval Jewish stories of the Golem, a magically animated homunculus built of clay. However, the possibility of actually constructing a conscious machine was probably first discussed by Ada Lovelace, in a set of notes written in 1842 about the Analytical Engine invented by Charles Babbage, a precursor (never built) to modern electronic computers. Lovelace was essentially dismissive of the idea that a machine such as the Analytical Engine could think in a humanlike way. She wrote:

It is desirable to guard against the possibility of exaggerated ideas that might arise as to the powers of the Analytical Engine. ... 

The Analytical Engine has no pretensions whatever to originate anything. It can do whatever we know how to order it to perform. It can follow analysis; but it has no power of anticipating any analytical relations or truths. Its province is to assist us in making available what we are already acquainted with.   . . .

In 2014, Victor Argonov . . . argues that a deterministic machine must be regarded as conscious if it is able to produce judgments on all problematic properties of consciousness (such as qualia or binding) having no innate (preloaded) philosophical knowledge on these issues, no philosophical discussions while learning, and no informational models of other creatures in its memory (such models may implicitly or explicitly contain knowledge about these creatures’ consciousness). 

However, this test can be used only to detect, but not refute the existence of consciousness. A positive result proves that machine is conscious but a negative result proves nothing. For example, absence of philosophical judgments may be caused by lack of the machine's intellect, not by absence of consciousness.
. . .

Phenomenology

Phenomenology is a method of inquiry that attempts to examine the structure of consciousness in its own right, putting aside problems regarding the relationship of consciousness to the physical world. 

This approach was first proposed by the philosopher Edmund Husserl, and later elaborated by other philosophers and scientists. Husserl's original concept gave rise to two distinct lines of inquiry, in philosophy and psychology. 

1. In philosophy, phenomenology has largely been devoted to fundamental metaphysical questions, such as the nature of intentionality ("aboutness"). 

2. In psychology, phenomenology largely has meant attempting to investigate consciousness using the method of introspection, which means looking into one's own mind and reporting what one observes. 

This method fell into disrepute in the early twentieth century because of grave doubts about its reliability, but has been rehabilitated to some degree, especially when used in combination with techniques for examining brain activity. 

Introspectively, the world of conscious experience seems to have considerable structure.  Immanuel Kant asserted that the world as we perceive it is organized according to a set of fundamental "intuitions", which include 'object' (we perceive the world as a set of distinct things); 'shape'; 'quality' (color, warmth, etc.); 'space' (distance, direction, and location); and 'time'. 

Some of these constructs, such as space and time, correspond to the way the world is structured by the laws of physics; for others the correspondence is not as clear. Understanding the physical basis of qualities, such as redness or pain, has been particularly challenging. David Chalmers has called this the hard problem of consciousness.

Some philosophers have argued that it is intrinsically unsolvable, because qualities ("qualia") are ineffable; that is, they are "raw feels", incapable of being analyzed into component processes.

Selected and edited from Wikipedia - consciousness

** **

       Dusk. Post. - Amorella

Monday, July 29, 2019

174. Notes - research readings and editing


174. 29 July 2019

       Early afternoon. You are at Heritage Park facing east in the shade not far south of the shelter. Carol is walking, and for a change, Carol is driving today so you are in the 'co-pilot' seat. - Amorella

       1253 hours. I have to get used to the seating arrangement while typing. I have to rest the MacBook on my left thigh and in process the keyboard wobbles a bit. Actually, the right thigh touching the armrest works better for stabilization but the keys don't line up for flow. Works better when the keyboard rests on both raised thighs but a bit uncomfortable on my hip joints, knees and ankles. So, I am back to the keyboard on my left thigh raised to 45 degrees or thereabouts. 

       Do not erase, young man. I'm checking out your technical writing skills. - Amorella

       1303 hours. Very funny. I taught technical writing for a time at Indian Hill; forgot about that. That's what I was going to do if I took the job at IBM in 1966, pay was much better than teaching but I had to wear a dress uniform -- dark suit, dark tie, black socks and a white shirt -- not my cup of tea. I forgot about teaching the class though. Three classic assignments also used in other writing classes: 1. describe the act of tying your shoe laces from start to finish; 2. including side details, describe a penny standing on end; and 3. describe light to someone your age who has always been totally blind. I loved teaching.

       You are home. Do not erase your reminiscing. You were thinking silently and your fingers kept moving across the keys. - Amorella

       Mid-afternoon. You had a late lunch at Potbelly's and are stopping for corn on the cob at Westervelt Farm off Africa Road before stopping at Kroger's north on State Street. Cathy is setting up a lunch for the four of you plus Wendy and Jim for later in the week. - Amorella

       Below is the full Wikipedia article on 'consciousness'. Miss Havisham and I will address selections pertinent to questions she is comfortable responding to. Once we have edited the material, you may post it. - Amorella

       Bedtime. You began the Consciousness article on Wikipedia with 41 pages and 10,782 words; we trimmed it to 16 pages and 4289 words. You also found  and have read two more inner related subjects: "Intentionality" and "Scholarly Approaches to Mysticism". We have more editing before posting 'Consciousness' for Ms Havisham. Post. - Amorella

       2256 hours. This research is quite interesting to me personally. 

       That it is, Mr. Orndorff. The subjects at hand are interlocked with who you are as a heartansoulanmind. mh

Sunday, July 28, 2019

173. Notes - the spiritual aspects of mind / consciousness


173. 28 July 2019

       You are with cold McD drinks at the north entrance to Macy's waiting on Carol as she shops for sales on this warm summer afternoon. - Amorella

       1304 hours. At least there is a breeze and it is not so muggy as it was a week ago. The last three sections of "Philosophy of Mind" from Wikipedia: Science, Neuroscience and Physics do not appear to be of use, as they, by definition are fact-oriented leaving no room for spiritual references.

** **

Science

The current scientific consensus across all fields is that there is no evidence for the existence of any kind of soul in the traditional sense . . ..

Neuroscience

Neuroscience as an interdisciplinary field, and its branch of cognitive neuroscience particularly, operates under the ontological assumption of physicalism. In other words, it assumes—in order to perform its science—that only the fundamental phenomena studied by physics exist. 


Physics

Physicist Sean M. Carroll has written that the idea of a soul is incompatible with quantum field theory (QFT). He writes that for a soul to exist: "Not only is new physics required, but dramatically new physics.

Within QFT, there can't be a new collection of 'spirit particles' and 'spirit forces' that interact with our regular atoms, because we would have detected them in existing experiments." . . . 
Some theorists have invoked quantum indeterminism as an explanatory mechanism for possible soul/brain interaction, but neuroscientist Peter Clarke found errors with this viewpoint, noting there is no evidence that such processes play a role in brain function; Clarke concluded that a Cartesian soul has no basis from quantum physics.

** **

       The scientists mentioned above follow a strict protocol in terms of science; certainly, physics has to be a part of what science is. 'Spirit particles' do not exist, thus the soul is not scientifically detectable. By most modern definitions of science therefore conclude the metaphysics of the soul is not applicable. 

       This selection of the article ends with, "Clarke concluded that the Cartesian soul has no basis from quantum physics." From this, I jump to the next selection in the list, Mind-Body dualism. mh

** **

[I separated sentences below into segments to make it easier for me to read and understand; if you are interested go to the actual article(s) in Wikipedia for your readings. - rho]

Mind–body dualism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  (Redirected from Cartesian dualism)
                                                     
Mind–body dualism, or mind–body duality, is a view in the philosophy of mind that mental phenomena are, in some respects, non-physical, or that the mind and body are distinct and separable. 
Thus, it encompasses a set of views about the relationship between mind and matter, and between subject and object, and is contrasted with other positions, such as physicalism and enactivism, in the mind–body problem
** **
         Obviously, the spiritual aspects of the mind are non-physical (no physics). However, the separation is less than fully distinct from the combined 'hardwired' heartanmind aspect. Humans cannot be distinctly and fully human without use of heartanmind together. - mh
** **
Continuing:
Aristotle shared Plato's view of multiple souls and further elaborated a hierarchical arrangement, corresponding to the distinctive functions of plants, animals, and people: 
a nutritive soul of growth and metabolism that all three share; a perceptive soul of pain, pleasure, and desire that only people and other animals share; 
and the faculty of reason that is unique to people only. 
In this view, a soul is the hylomorphic form [matter and form] of a viable organism, wherein each level of the hierarchy formally supervenes upon the substance of the preceding level. 
Thus, for Aristotle, all three souls perish when the living organism dies.
** **
         Mr. Orndorff's blog is limited to the human soul only. The human soul has no hierarchy, the soul is most generally holistic in its nature. The soul can perish but it is by the soul's will alone. It cannot perish while 'carrying' a human or human-like heartanmind. - mh
** **
Continuing:
For Plato however, the soul was not dependent on the physical body; he believed in metempsychosis, the migration of the soul to a new physical body. 
         ** **
         [Metempsychosis is a philosophical term in the Greek     language referring to transmigration of the soul, especially   its reincarnation after death. Generally, the term is derived from the context of ancient Greek philosophy, and has been recontextualised by modern philosophers such as Arthur Schopenhauer and Kurt Gödel; otherwise, the term "transmigration" is more appropriate. . ..    (Selected from Wikipedia)]
         ** **
         The human soul is, within its own aspect, subject to transmigration; especially among the closest of friends. This can best be understood within a poetic framework not a scientific one, i.e. think of souls holding hands with one another. This can be intuitively sensed, usually unspoken, by all parties. This is not science, but it is humanly felt and understood from time to time throughout life. - mh
** **
Continuing:
Dualism is closely associated with the thought of René Descartes (1641), whichholds that the mind is a nonphysical—and therefore, non-spatial [not relating to, occupying, or having the character of space] —substance. 
Descartes clearly identified the mind with consciousness and self-awareness and distinguished this from the brain as the seat of intelligence. 
Hence, he was the first to formulate the mind–body problem in the form in which it exists today.  . . .
('René Descartes's illustration of dualism [shows] inputs are passed on by the sensory organs to the epiphysis [the pineal gland] in the brain and from there to the immaterial spirit.) [Illustration not included.']

** **

         I, Ms Havisham, bold printed and edited the immediate material above for clarity. Consciousness and self-awareness are directly associated to the spiritual aspects of the mind. - mh

** **

         The material below demonstrates a sense of how such mind/body 'mental states' occur. I include it to help with clarity and understanding because these aspects within reasoning are a part of underlying human reasoning. - mh

         [Note. Including the 'Types' below are aspects of the Mind/Body problem Ms Havisham felt necessary to cover. Consciousness also includes the unconscious mind for without it the mind would not be fully human. - Amorella]

Types

Ontological dualism makes dual commitments about the nature of existence as it relates to mind and matter, and can be divided into three different types:
1. Substance dualism asserts that mind and matter are fundamentally distinct kinds of foundations. 
2. Property dualism suggests that the ontological distinction lies in the differences between properties of mind and matter (as in emergentism). 
3. Predicate dualism claims the irreducibility of mental predicates to physical predicates. 

 

Substance or Cartesian dualism

Substance dualism is a type of dualism most famously defended by René Descartes, which states that there are two kinds of foundation: mental and body.
This philosophy states that the mental can exist outside of the body, and the body cannot think. 
Substance dualism is important historically for having given rise to much thought regarding the famous mind–body problem.
Substance dualism is a philosophical position compatible with most theologies which claim that immortal souls occupy an independent realm of existence distinct from that of the physical world.

Property dualism


Property dualism asserts that an ontological distinction lies in the differences between properties of mind and matter, and that consciousness is ontologically irreducible to neurobiology and physics. 
It asserts that when matter is organized in the appropriate way (i.e., in the way that living human bodies are organized), mental properties emerge. 
Hence, it is a sub-branch of emergent materialism. What views properly fall under the property dualism rubric is itself a matter of dispute. 
Non-reductive physicalism is a form of property dualism in which it is asserted that all mental states are causally reducible to physical states. 
One argument for this has been made in the form of anomalous monism expressed by Donald Davidson, where it is argued that mental events are identical to physical events, 
and there can be strict law-governed causal relationships. 
Another argument for this has been expressed by John Searle, who is the advocate of a distinctive form of physicalism he calls biological naturalism
His view is that although mental states are ontologically irreducible to physical states, they are causally reducible (see causality). 
He has acknowledged that "to many people" his views and those of property dualists look a lot alike. But he thinks the comparison is misleading.

Epiphenomenalism


Epiphenomenalism is a form of property dualism, in which it is asserted that one or more mental states do not have any influence on physical states (both ontologically and causally irreducible). 
It asserts that while material causes give rise to sensations, volitions, ideas, etc., such mental phenomena themselves cause nothing further: they are causal dead-ends. 
This can be contrasted to interactionism, on the other hand, in which mental causes can produce material effects, and vice versa. 
. . .

Occasionalism


Occasionalism is a philosophical doctrine about causation which says that created substances cannot be efficient causes of events.
Instead, all events are taken to be caused directly by God itself.
The theory states that the illusion of efficient causation between mundane events arises out of a constant conjunction that God had instituted, such that every instance where the cause is present will constitute 
an "occasion" for the effect to occur as an expression of the aforementioned power. 
This "occasioning" relation, however, falls short of efficient causation.
In this view, it is not the case that the first event causes God to cause the second event: 
rather, God first caused one and then caused the other, 
but chose to regulate such behaviour in accordance with general laws of nature. 
Some of its most prominent historical exponents have been Louis de la Forge, Arnold Geulincx, and Nicholas Malebranche.

Kantianism


According to Immanuel Kant's philosophy, there is a distinction between actions done by desire and the ones performed by liberty (categorical imperative). 
Thus, not all physical actions are caused by either matter or freedom. 
Some actions are purely animal in nature, while others are the result of mental action on matter.

Selected and edited and selectively parted for my easier reading and comprehension - from Wikipedia - rho

** **

       Concluding this Wikipedia article on the MInd/Body Problem with Ms Havisham leaves one more selection on the modern soul for Ms Havisham: consciousness within the spiritual aspects of the mind. - Amorella

       1712 hours. I find this blog quite fascinating to think on and wonder about in terms of plausibility within the real physical world and universe where living humanity finds itself every night and day. I share this for others to read and consider within their own private life. For me these two blogs (mind and spirit) are not about truth, but they are projections for a better personal understanding of what the modern human spirit, the heartansoulanmind, is. - rho

       Post. - Amorella



      Evening. Introduction to Consciousness. Let's drop in a dictionary definition first. - Amorella

** **
# One

consciousness - noun - the state of being awake and aware of one's surroundings: she failed to regain consciousness and died two days later

• the awareness or perception of something by a person: her acute consciousness of Mike's presence

• the fact of awareness by the mind of itself and the world: consciousness emerges from the operations of the brain.

Selected and edited from - the Oxford/American Apple software

** **

       2117 hours. One can see right away that there is a problem with this definition where it is written: "consciousness emerges from the operations of the brain." Note 173 shows another point of view on consciousness. - rho

** **
Dualism is closely associated with the thought of René Descartes (1641), which holds that the mind is a nonphysical—and therefore, non-spatial [not relating to, occupying, or having the character of space] — substance.

Descartes clearly identified the mind with consciousness and self-awareness and distinguished this from the brain as the seat of intelligence. 

(From Wikipedia - Mind-Body Dualism)

** **

       Let's see what holds in two other dictionary definitions: the Merriam-Webster and the Cambridge. - Amorella

** **

# Two

consciousness- noun

1a: the quality or state of being aware especially of something within oneself


  b: the state or fact of being conscious of an external object, state, or fact

  c: AWARENESS especially: concern for some social or political cause; the organization aims to raise the political consciousness of teenagers. 

2: the state of being characterized by sensation, emotion, volition, and thought: MIND

3: the totality of conscious states of an individual

4: the normal state of conscious life regained consciousness

5: the upper level of mental life of which the person is aware as contrasted with unconscious processes

Selected and edited from - https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conscious

** **

and

** **
# Three

consciousnessnoun 
1. the state of being awake, aware of what is around you, and able to think: 
He lost consciousness on the way to the hospital, and regained consciousness the next day.

2. the fact of noticing the existence of something: 
There’s definitely a consciousness of the employment market among the students.

3. the state of understanding and realizing something: 
[ + that ] Her consciousness that she's different makes her feel uneasy.
Working in an unemployment office had helped to raise his political consciousness.

4. the state of being awake, thinking, and knowing what is happening around you: 
He lost consciousness after his accident and never recovered/regained it.

And, another mentioned example:

5. altered consciousness In this altered consciousness, the scale of spaces and things appears relational rather than axiomatic, and the psyche and the social become integrated.

                                                      From Cambridge English Corpus 

Selected and edited from- https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/
consciousness

** **

       2221 hours. The Merriam-Webster actually mentions 'MIND', in all caps no less. The Cambridge makes no mention of 'mind' directly. Now, one more example in this context. This time from Wikipedia.

** **

Consciousness

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is about cognition
Consciousness is the state or quality of awareness or of being aware of an external object or something within oneself. It has been defined variously in terms of sentience, awareness, qualia, subjectivity, the ability to experience or to feel, wakefulness, having a sense of selfhood or soul, the fact that there is something "that it is like" to "have" or "be" it, and the executive control system of the mind. 
Despite the difficulty in definition, many philosophers believe that there is a broadly shared underlying intuition about what consciousness is. 
As Max Velmans and Susan Schneider wrote in The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness: "Anything that we are aware of at a given moment forms part of our consciousness, making conscious experience at once the most familiar and most mysterious aspect of our lives." You become aware that your actions have an effect on other people.
** **

       Consciousness and Ms Havisham are continued tomorrow. Post. - Amorella

       I do not feel the need for these various definitions of consciousness. Consciousness cements Self to Purpose and Will. - mh