157. 1 July 2019
Late evening. Driving Day II. Knoxville to Westerville. Supper at Potbelly's with Kim, Owen and Brennan while Paul was playing a round of golf with friends. You and Carol are both still unpacking. A few minutes ago, you read an article in today's Columbus Dispatch about a 'soul's companion'. The focus was on a husband or wife who lost her or his companion for life. What is your question? - Amorella
2309 hours. I don't really know what or who is supposed to be the soul's companion. -- I spent some time reading from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's "Ancient Theories of Soul", and copying 21 pages worth of very interesting material.
Tomorrow, and as time permits I will sort through this material I give you my perspective. - mh
2335 hours. I cannot imagine you doing this, Miss Havisham.
The point is to give you a theoretical perspective from this soul's objective perspective. Can the soul be detached? Of course. How else could one lose her or his soul? - mh
2341 hours. This is an example of one of the reasons I think you are a made of character by Amorella, who for all I know, may also be a made-up character. It doesn't take much of an agnostic to see through this as a whimsical self-induced private entertainment for no other earthly reason than to take up time from the mind and the heart, i.e. to make them puppets to get by another day of mental distraction.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I expect a thoughtful and honest message formed in a polite manner.