Thursday, July 4, 2019

158. Notes -" authenticity the key" - Amorella


158. 4 July 2019

       Mid-afternoon. You had a good dinner at Texas Roadhouse and are presently facing west at Westerville's quite quiet Heritage Park opposite the north end picnic area on this warm and humid-like summer day. Miss Havisham wants you to begin with that ancient philosophy on the soul, but I, the Amorella, am setting up the focus. I will go through the Stanford document to set up the criteria Miss H. can comment on. Why? Because my consistencies and standards apply first, even before yours, orndorff.

       1522 hours. This was unexpected, but I understand. You have provided a consistency though both blogs, and even so into the three original hardbound Merlyn novels which you 'supervised' -- one novel published every year for three years. What is the key for 'standardization' Amorella, if I may ask?

       Authenticity, my young friend. - Amorella

** **
authenticity - noun - the quality of being authentic: the paper should have established the authenticity of the documents before publishing them.

authentic - adjective - 

1 of undisputed origin; genuine: the letter is now accepted as an authentic document | authentic 14th-century furniture. 

 made or done in the traditional or original way, or in a way that faithfully resembles an original: the restaurant serves authentic Italian meals | every detail of the movie was totally authentic. 

 based on facts; accurate or reliable: an authentic depiction of the situation. 

 (in existentialist philosophy) relating to or denoting an emotionally appropriate, significant, purposive, and responsible mode of human life.

ORIGIN late Middle English: via Old French from late Latin authenticus, from Greek authentikos principal, genuine’.

Selected and edited from the Oxford/American


** **

       1536 hours. I understand this to a point, but much of this material is not based on facts as such but rather on my subjective response to self-documentation. Facts about me are basically subjective by definition and cannot be objectively quantified. This is embarrassing me because I cannot by definition be objective about myself other than I am a standard issue human being with standard human behaviors at least from what I have learned at the college, and graduate level. 

       You and others of your kind are facts to the Amorella. You exist. I know and accept this because I existed first and foremost before human and other similar like existences with heartsansoulsanminds. 

       1607 hours. Decades ago, I asked you if "Amorella" meant "little love" because that's what I saw from the Latin I remember. Originally, in the 1990's, you chose to call yourself "Romela" in my Notes. To me, "ella" in Latin means "she". Anyway, I always use the feminine pronoun. 

       Carol forgot she needed detergent for clothes, so here you are at Kroger's in north Westerville. - Amorella

       1654 hours. Alas, even if what you say is true, I am the factual one because I legally exist. If you, the Amorella, existed before the universe as we know it was formed, then this is only your subjective opinion. No witnesses. I do not know, or pretend to know, who or what friendly spirit you are. I take you at your word, literally and figuratively, (I choose to have no choice) and by me having 'witnessed' you (mentally/spiritually) for decades. These words in blogs and fictions surround your 'space' or 'grace', as it were. I understand/accept you being between the words and lines on the proverbial page, so to speak. I am a primary witness within this context presently. It is easiest and most practical for me to see you as a real spirit who displays contextual anger or kindness towards me from time to time. This demonstrational display has always been accepted by me for my personal spiritual self-learning. If nothing more this blog, this 'device of thought' is, as contextually as real as I am. I have nothing else to say presently. (1742)

       Post. - Amorella

       2250 hours. As the agnostic that I am, I cannot believe you are anything but a figment of my imagination based on past spiritual-like events that appeared Real to me. Again, as above with yourself, Amorella, I am a witness with no proof, only, at most, circumstantial evidence based on many decades of written Notes I have taken and kept copies of. I feel I am a reasonable man and have led a reasonable human life professionally and privately. I have both a romantic and neo-classic nature and thus I am particularly drawn to both in my writing and art. This shows throughout all of my kept writings, even from back in high school and college days. This is a part of my basic human condition and I have no choice but to consciously accept this fully; even before G-D, I cannot think of anything else I would say, except that, if G-D is indeed Real, G-D already more fully knows my heartansoulanmind than I presently or ever will, I imagine. (2310) - rho

      Post. - Amorella

No comments:

Post a Comment

I expect a thoughtful and honest message formed in a polite manner.