Sunday, March 3, 2019

66. Notes - iceanwateranair/airanwateranice


66. 3 March 2019

       Pleasant Sunday afternoon with falling snow. You found an article on consciousness earlier today. Here it is. - Amorella

** **
1.   
The Conversation
How we identified brain patterns of consciousness
February 6, 2019 2.59pm EST

Brain connections have been linked to consciousness. 

Author
1.   Davinia Fernández-Espejo
2.   
Senior Lecturer, School of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham

Disclosure statement
Davinia Fernández-Espejo receives funding from the Medical Research Council and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, and has previously been funded by the Canadian Institute of Health Research and the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science

**

Partners
University of Birminghamprovides funding as a founding partner of The Conversation UK.
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons license.

·      **
Humans have learned to travel through space, eradicate diseases and understand nature at the breathtakingly tiny level of fundamental particles. Yet we have no idea how consciousness – our ability to experience and learn about the world in this way and report it to others – arises in the brain. 
In fact, while scientists have been preoccupied with understanding consciousness for centuries, it remains one of the most important unanswered questions of modern neuroscience. Now our new study, published in Science Advances, sheds light on the mystery by uncovering networks in the brain that are at work when we are conscious. 
It’s not just a philosophical question. Determining whether a patient is “aware” after suffering a severe brain injury is a huge challenge both for doctors and families who need to make decisions about care. Modern brain imaging techniques are starting to lift this uncertainty, giving us unprecedented insights into human consciousness. 
For example, we know that complex brain areas including the prefrontal cortex or the precuneus, which are responsible for a range of higher cognitive functions, are typically involved in conscious thought. However, large brain areas do many things. We therefore wanted to find out how consciousness is represented in the brain on the level of specific networks. 
The reason it is so difficult to study conscious experiences is that they are entirely internal and cannot be accessed by others. For example, we can both be looking at the same picture on our screens, but I have no way to tell whether my experience of seeing that picture is similar to yours, unless you tell me about it. Only conscious individuals can have subjective experiences and, therefore, the most direct way to assess whether somebody is conscious is to ask them to tell us about them.




But what would happen if you lose your ability to speak? In that case, I could still ask you some questions and you could perhaps sign your responses, for example by nodding your head or moving your hand. Of course, the information I would obtain this way would not be as rich, but it would still be enough for me to know that you do indeed have experiences. If you were not able to produce any responses though, I would not have a way to tell whether you’re conscious and would probably assume you’re not. 
Scanning for networks
Our new study, the product of a collaboration across seven countries, has identified brain signatures that can indicate consciousness without relying on self-report or the need to ask patients to engage in a particular task, and can differentiate between conscious and unconscious patients after brain injury. 
When the brain gets severely damaged, for example in a serious traffic accident, people can end up in a coma. This is a state in which you lose your ability to be awake and aware of your surrounding and need mechanical support to breathe. It typically doesn’t last more than a few days. After that, patients sometimes wake up but don’t show any evidence of having any awareness of themselves or the world around them – this is known as a “vegetative state”. Another possibility is that they show evidence only of a very minimal awareness – referred to as a minimally conscious state. For most patients, this means that their brain still perceives things but they don’t experience them. However, a small percentage of these patients are indeed conscious but simply unable to produce any behavioural responses.
We used a technique known as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which allows us to measure the activity of the brain and the way some regions “communicate” with others. Specifically, when a brain region is more active, it consumes more oxygen and needs higher blood supply to meet its demands. We can detect these changes even when the participants are at rest and measure how it varies across regions to create patterns of connectivity across the brain.
We used the method on 53 patients in a vegetative state, 59 people in a minimally conscious state and 47 healthy participants. They came from hospitals in Paris, Liège, New York, London, and Ontario. Patients from Paris, Liège, and New York were diagnosed through standardised behavioural assessments, such as being asked to move a hand or blink an eye. In contrast, patients from London were assessed with other advanced brain imaging techniques that required the patient to modulate their brain to produce neural responses instead of external physical ones – such as imagining moving one’s hand instead of actually moving it.
In consciousness and unconsciousness, our brains have different modes to self-organise as time goes by. When we are conscious, brain regions communicate with a rich temperament, showing both positive and negative connections. Credit: E. Tagliazucchi & A. Demertzi

We found two main patterns of communication across regions. One simply reflected physical connections of the brain, such as communication only between pairs of regions that have a direct physical link between them. 
This was seen in patients with virtually no conscious experience. One represented very complex brain-wide dynamic interactions across a set of 42 brain regions that belong to six brain networks with important roles in cognition (see image above). This complex pattern was almost only present in people with some level of consciousness. 
Importantly, this complex pattern disappeared when patients were under deep anaesthesia, confirming that our methods were indeed sensitive to the patients’ level of consciousness and not their general brain damage or external responsiveness.
Research like this has the potential to lead to an understanding of how objective biomarkers can play a crucial role in medical decision making. In the future it might be possible to develop ways to externally modulate these conscious signatures and restore some degree of awareness or responsiveness in patients who have lost them, for example by using non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial electrical stimulation. Indeed, in my research group at the University of Birmingham, we are starting to explore this avenue.
Excitingly the research also takes us as step closer to understanding how consciousness arises in the brain. With more data on the neural signatures of consciousness in people experiencing various altered states of consciousness – ranging from taking psychedelics to experiencing lucid dreams – we may one day crack the puzzle.
Selected and edited from - The Conversation UK

[Sorry, the photos do not appear but can be seen in the original online article.]
** **
       The above article demonstrates how consciousness appears to operate in the brain. What we are doing in this blog is dropping the level also to the unconsciousness of the brain because, in here, both levels are useful to the human spirit, to the heartansoulanmind. - Amorella

       1530 hours. The brain pattern images are important to me also because they give me a sense of what the soul holds as far as information in a metaphysical format from the heartanmind. 

       The heartansoulanmind is not metaphorically machine-like or biological/chemical in 'nature'. It is a waste of time to go further in this direction. Think of the transition of physical thought to a sense of nonphysical thought as iceanwateranair/airanwateranice in a paradox of being and not being on any level. - Amorella

       2052 hours. I assume from the above that metaphorically, as far as this blog is concerned, the heartansoulanmind are mysteriously transcendental as the various states of water (solid, liquid and gas) transcend through their stages.

** **

Properties of water

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Water 
(H2O) is a polar inorganic compound that is at room temperature a tasteless and odorless liquid, which is nearly colorless apart from an inherent hint of blue. It is by far the most studied chemical compound and is described as the "universal solvent" [18][19] and the "solvent of life".[20] It is the most abundant substance on Earth[21] and the only common substance to exist as a solid, liquid, and gas on Earth's surface.[22] It is also the third most abundant molecule in the universe.[21]
Water molecules form hydrogen bonds with each other and are strongly polar. This polarity allows it to dissociate ions in salts and bond to other polar substances such as alcohols and acids, thus dissolving them. Its hydrogen bonding causes its many unique properties, such as having a solid form less dense than its liquid form,[c] a relatively high boiling point of 100 °C for its molar mass, and a high heat capacity.
Water is amphoteric, meaning that it can exhibit properties of an acid or a base, depending on the pH of the solution that it is in; it readily produces both H+
 and OH
 ions.[c] Related to its amphoteric character, it undergoes self-ionization. The product of the activities, or approximately, the concentrations of H+
 and OH
 is a constant, so their respective concentrations are inversely proportional to each other.[23]

Physical properties


Water is the chemical substance with chemical formula H2O; one molecule of water has two hydrogen atoms covalently bonded to a single oxygen atom.[24]Water is a tasteless, odorless liquid at ambient temperature and pressure. Liquid water has weak absorption bands at wavelengths of around 750 nm which cause it to appear to have a blue colour.[3] This can easily be observed in a water-filled bath or wash-basin whose lining is white. Large ice crystals, as in glaciers, also appear blue.
Unlike other analogous hydrides of the oxygen family, water is primarily a liquid under standard conditions due to hydrogen bonding. The molecules of water are constantly moving in relation to each other, and the hydrogen bonds are continually breaking and reforming at timescales faster than 200 femtoseconds (2×10−13seconds).[25] However, these bonds are strong enough to create many of the peculiar properties of water, some of which make it integral to life.

Water, ice, and vapor

Within the Earth's atmosphere and surface, the liquid phase is the most common and is the form that is generally denoted by the word "water". The solid phase of water is known as ice and commonly takes the structure of hard, amalgamated crystals, such as ice cubes, or loosely accumulated granular crystals, like snow. Aside from common hexagonal crystalline ice, other crystalline and amorphous phases of ice are known. The gaseous phase of water is known as water vapor (or steam). Visible steam and clouds are formed from minute droplets of water suspended in the air.
Water also forms a supercritical fluid. The critical temperature is 647 K and the critical pressure is 22.064 MPa. In nature this only rarely occurs in extremely hostile conditions. A likely example of naturally occurring supercritical water is in the hottest parts of deep water hydrothermal vents, in which water is heated to the critical temperature by volcanic plumes and the critical pressure is caused by the weight of the ocean at the extreme depths where the vents are located. This pressure is reached at a depth of about 2200 meters: much less than the mean depth of the ocean (3800 meters).[26]

Heat capacity and heats of vaporization and fusion


Water has a very high specific heat capacity of 4.1814 J/(g·K) at 25 °C – the second highest among all the heteroatomic species (after ammonia), as well as a high heat of vaporization(40.65 kJ/mol or 2257 kJ/kg at the normal boiling point), both of which are a result of the extensive hydrogen bonding between its molecules. These two unusual properties allow water to moderate Earth's climate by buffering large fluctuations in temperature. Most of the additional energy stored in the climate system since 1970 has accumulated in the oceans.[27]
The specific enthalpy of fusion (more commonly known as latent heat) of water is 333.55 kJ/kg at 0 °C: the same amount of energy is required to melt ice as to warm ice from −160 °C up to its melting point or to heat the same amount of water by about 80 °C. Of common substances, only that of ammonia is higher. This property confers resistance to melting on the ice of glaciers and drift ice. Before and since the advent of mechanical refrigeration, ice was and still is in common use for retarding food spoilage.
The specific heat capacity of ice at −10 °C is 2.03 J/(g·K)[28] and the heat capacity of steam at 100 °C is 2.08 J/(g·K).[29]

Density of water and ice

The density of water is about 1 gram per cubic centimetre (62 lb/cu ft): this relationship was originally used to define the gram.[30] The density varies with temperature, but not linearly: as the temperature increases, the density rises to a peak at 3.98 °C (39.16 °F) and then decreases.[31] This unusual negative thermal expansion below 4 °C (39 °F) is also observed in molten silica.[32] Regular, hexagonal ice is also less dense than liquid water—upon freezing, the density of water decreases by about 9%.[33] Other substances that expand on freezing are silicon (at melting point of 1687 K ​[1414 °C, ​2577 °F]), gallium (with melting point of 302.9146 K ​[29.7646 °C, ​85.5763 °F]), germanium (which melts at 1211.40 K ​[938.25 °C, ​1720.85 °F]), antimony (at m.p. of 903.78 K ​[630.63 °C, ​1167.13 °F]), bismuth (with m.p. of 544.7 K ​[271.5 °C, ​520.7 °F]). Also, fairly pure silicon has a negative coefficient of thermal expansion for temperatures between about 18 and 120 kelvins.[34]
These effects are due to the reduction of thermal motion with cooling, which allows water molecules to form more hydrogen bonds that prevent the molecules from coming close to each other.[31] While below 4 °C the breakage of hydrogen bonds due to heating allows water molecules to pack closer despite the increase in the thermal motion (which tends to expand a liquid), above 4 °C water expands as the temperature increases.[31] Water near the boiling point is about 4% less dense than water at 4 °C (39 °F).[33][d]
Under increasing pressure, ice undergoes a number of transitions to other polymorphs with higher density than liquid water, such as ice II, ice III, high-density amorphous ice (HDA), and very-high-density amorphous ice (VHDA).[35][36]

The unusual density curve and lower density of ice than of water is vital to life—if water were most dense at the freezing point, then in winter the very cold water at the surface of lakes and other water bodies would sink, the lake could freeze from the bottom up, and all life in them would be killed.[33] Furthermore, given that water is a good thermal insulator (due to its heat capacity), some frozen lakes might not completely thaw in summer.[33] The layer of ice that floats on top insulates the water below.[37] Water at about 4 °C (39 °F) also sinks to the bottom, thus keeping the temperature of the water at the bottom constant (see diagram).[33]

Density of saltwater and ice

 

WOA surface density
The density of salt water depends on the dissolved salt content as well as the temperature. Ice still floats in the oceans, otherwise they would freeze from the bottom up. However, the salt content of oceans lowers the freezing point by about 1.9 °C[38] (see here for explanation) and lowers the temperature of the density maximum of water to the former freezing point at 0 °C. This is why, in ocean water, the downward convection of colder water is not blocked by an expansion of water as it becomes colder near the freezing point. The oceans' cold water near the freezing point continues to sink. So creatures that live at the bottom of cold oceans like the Arctic Ocean generally live in water 4 °C colder than at the bottom of frozen-over fresh water lakes and rivers.
As the surface of salt water begins to freeze (at −1.9 °C[38] for normal salinity seawater, 3.5%) the ice that forms is essentially salt-free, with about the same density as freshwater ice. This ice floats on the surface, and the salt that is "frozen out" adds to the salinity and density of the sea water just below it, in a process known as brine rejection. This denser salt water sinks by convection and the replacing seawater is subject to the same process. This produces essentially freshwater ice at −1.9 °C[38] on the surface. The increased density of the sea water beneath the forming ice causes it to sink towards the bottom. On a large scale, the process of brine rejection and sinking cold salty water results in ocean currents forming to transport such water away from the Poles, leading to a global system of currents called the thermohaline circulation.

Miscibility and condensation


Water is miscible with many liquids, including ethanol in all proportions. Water and most oils are immiscible usually forming layers according to increasing density from the top. This can be predicted by comparing the polarity. Water being a relatively polar compound will tend to be miscible with liquids of high polarity such as ethanol and acetone, whereas compounds with low polarity will tend to be immiscible and poorly soluble such as with hydrocarbons.
As a gas, water vapor is completely miscible with air. On the other hand, the maximum water vapor pressure that is thermodynamically stable with the liquid (or solid) at a given temperature is relatively low compared with total atmospheric pressure. For example, if the vapor's partial pressure is 2% of atmospheric pressure and the air is cooled from 25 °C, starting at about 22 °C water will start to condense, defining the dew point, and creating fog or dew. The reverse process accounts for the fog burning off in the morning. If the humidity is increased at room temperature, for example, by running a hot shower or a bath, and the temperature stays about the same, the vapor soon reaches the pressure for phase change, and then condenses out as minute water droplets, commonly referred to as steam.
A saturated gas or one with 100% relative humidity is when the vapor pressure of water in the air is at equilibrium with vapor pressure due to (liquid) water; water (or ice, if cool enough) will fail to lose mass through evaporation when exposed to saturated air. Because the amount of water vapor in air is small, relative humidity, the ratio of the partial pressure due to the water vapor to the saturated partial vapor pressure, is much more useful. Vapor pressure above 100% relative humidity is called super-saturated and can occur if air is rapidly cooled, for example, by rising suddenly in an updraft.[e]

Vapor pressure



Compressibility

The compressibility of water is a function of pressure and temperature. At 0 °C, at the limit of zero pressure, the compressibility is 5.1×10−10 Pa−1. At the zero-pressure limit, the compressibility reaches a minimum of 4.4×10−10 Pa−1 around 45 °C before increasing again with increasing temperature. As the pressure is increased, the comprssibility decreases, being 3.9×10−10 Pa−1 at 0 °C and 100 megapascals (1,000 bar).[39]
The bulk modulus of water is about 2.2 GPa.[40] The low compressibility of non-gases, and of water in particular, leads to their often being assumed as incompressible. The low compressibility of water means that even in the deep oceans at 4 km depth, where pressures are 40 MPa, there is only a 1.8% decrease in volume.[40]

Triple point


The temperature and pressure at which ordinary solid, liquid, and gaseous water coexist in equilibrium is a triple point of water. Since 1954, this point had been used to define the base unit of temperature, the kelvin[41][42] but, starting in 2019, the kelvin will be defined using the Boltzmann constant, rather than the triple point of water.[43]
Due to the existence of many polymorphs (forms) of ice, water has other triple points, which have either three polymorphs of ice or two polymorphs of ice and liquid in equilibrium.[42]Gustav Heinrich Johann Apollon Tammann in Göttingen produced data on several other triple points in the early 20th century. Kamb and others documented further triple points in the 1960s.[44][45][46]

Melting point

The melting point of ice is 0 °C (32 °F; 273 K) at standard pressure; however, pure liquid water can be supercooled well below that temperature without freezing if the liquid is not mechanically disturbed. It can remain in a fluid state down to its homogeneous nucleation point of about 231 K (−42 °C; −44 °F).[48] The melting point of ordinary hexagonal ice falls slightly under moderately high pressures, by 0.0073 °C (0.0131 °F)/atm[f] or about 0.5 °C (0.90 °F)/70 atm[g][49] as the stabilization energy of hydrogen bonding is exceeded by intermolecular repulsion, but as ice transforms into its allotropes (see crystalline states of ice) above 209.9 MPa (2,072 atm), the melting point increases markedly with pressure, i.e., reaching 355 K (82 °C) at 2.216 GPa (21,870 atm) (triple point of Ice VII[50]).

Electrical properties

Electrical conductivity

Pure water containing no exogenous ions is an excellent insulator, but not even "deionized" water is completely free of ions. Water undergoes auto-ionization in the liquid state, when two water molecules form one hydroxide anion (OH) and one hydronium cation (H3O+).
Because water is such a good solvent, it almost always has some solute dissolved in it, often a salt. If water has even a tiny amount of such an impurity, then the ions can carry charges back and forth, allowing the water to conduct electricity far more readily.
It is known that the theoretical maximum electrical resistivity for water is approximately 18.2 MΩ·cm (182 ·m) at 25 °C.[51] This figure agrees well with what is typically seen on reverse osmosis, ultra-filtered and deionized ultra-pure water systems used, for instance, in semiconductor manufacturing plants. A salt or acid contaminant level exceeding even 100 parts per trillion (ppt) in otherwise ultra-pure water begins to noticeably lower its resistivity by up to several kΩ·m.[citation needed]
In pure water, sensitive equipment can detect a very slight electrical conductivity of 0.05501 ± 0.0001 µS/cm at 25.00 °C.[51]Water can also be electrolyzed into oxygen and hydrogen gases but in the absence of dissolved ions this is a very slow process, as very little current is conducted. In ice, the primary charge carriers are protons (see proton conductor).[52] Ice was previously thought to have a small but measurable conductivity of 1×10−10 S/cm, but this conductivity is now thought to be almost entirely from surface defects, and without those, ice is an insulator with an immeasurably small conductivity.[31]

Polarity and hydrogen bonding


An important feature of water is its polar nature. The structure has a bent molecular geometry for the two hydrogens from the oxygen vertex. The oxygen atom also has two lone pairs of electrons. One effect usually ascribed to the lone pairs is that the H–O–H gas phase bend angle is 104.48°,[53] which is smaller than the typical tetrahedral angle of 109.47°. The lone pairs are closer to the oxygen atom than the electrons sigma bonded to the hydrogens, so they require more space. The increased repulsion of the lone pairs forces the O–H bonds closer to each other.[54]
Another consequence of its structure is that water is a polar molecule. Due to the difference in electronegativity, a bond dipole moment points from each H to the O, making the oxygen partially negative and each hydrogen partially positive. A large molecular dipole, points from a region between the two hydrogen atoms to the oxygen atom. The charge differences cause water molecules to aggregate (the relatively positive areas being attracted to the relatively negative areas). This attraction, hydrogen bonding, explains many of the properties of water, such as its solvent properties.[55]
Although hydrogen bonding is a relatively weak attraction compared to the covalent bonds within the water molecule itself, it is responsible for a number of water's physical properties. These properties include its relatively high melting and boiling point temperatures: more energy is required to break the hydrogen bonds between water molecules. In contrast, hydrogen sulfide (H
2S), has much weaker hydrogen bonding due to sulfur's lower electronegativity. H2S is a gas at room temperature, in spite of hydrogen sulfide having nearly twice the molar mass of water. The extra bonding between water molecules also gives liquid water a large specific heat capacity. This high heat capacity makes water a good heat storage medium (coolant) and heat shield.

Cohesion and adhesion


Water molecules stay close to each other (cohesion), due to the collective action of hydrogen bonds between water molecules. These hydrogen bonds are constantly breaking, with new bonds being formed with different water molecules; but at any given time in a sample of liquid water, a large portion of the molecules are held together by such bonds.[56]
Water also has high adhesion properties because of its polar nature. On extremely clean/smooth glass the water may form a thin film because the molecular forces between glass and water molecules (adhesive forces) are stronger than the cohesive forces. In biological cells and organelles, water is in contact with membrane and protein surfaces that are hydrophilic; that is, surfaces that have a strong attraction to water. Irving Langmuir observed a strong repulsive force between hydrophilic surfaces. To dehydrate hydrophilic surfaces—to remove the strongly held layers of water of hydration—requires doing substantial work against these forces, called hydration forces. These forces are very large but decrease rapidly over a nanometer or less.[57] They are important in biology, particularly when cells are dehydrated by exposure to dry atmospheres or to extracellular freezing.[58]

Surface tension


This paper clip is under the water level, which has risen gently and smoothly. Surface tension prevents the clip from submerging and the water from overflowing the glass edges.

Water has an unusually high surface tension of 71.99 mN/m at 25 °C[59] which is caused by the strength of the hydrogen bonding between water molecules.[60] This allows insects to walk on water.[60]

Capillary action

Because water has strong cohesive and adhesive forces, it exhibits capillary action.[61]Strong cohesion from hydrogen bonding and adhesion allows trees to transport water more than 100 m upward.[60]

Water as a solvent


Water is an excellent solvent due to its high dielectric constant.[62] Substances that mix well and dissolve in water are known as hydrophilic ("water-loving") substances, while those that do not mix well with water are known as hydrophobic ("water-fearing") substances.[63] The ability of a substance to dissolve in water is determined by whether or not the substance can match or better the strong attractive forces that water molecules generate between other water molecules. If a substance has properties that do not allow it to overcome these strong intermolecular forces, the molecules are precipitated out from the water. Contrary to the common misconception, water and hydrophobic substances do not "repel", and the hydration of a hydrophobic surface is energetically, but not entropically, favorable.
When an ionic or polar compound enters water, it is surrounded by water molecules (hydration). The relatively small size of water molecules (~ 3 angstroms) allows many water molecules to surround one molecule of solute. The partially negative dipole ends of the water are attracted to positively charged components of the solute, and vice versa for the positive dipole ends.
In general, ionic and polar substances such as acids, alcohols, and salts are relatively soluble in water, and non-polar substances such as fats and oils are not. Non-polar molecules stay together in water because it is energetically more favorable for the water molecules to hydrogen bond to each other than to engage in van der Waals interactions with non-polar molecules.
An example of an ionic solute is table salt; the sodium chloride, NaCl, separates into Na+cations and Cl anions, each being surrounded by water molecules. The ions are then easily transported away from their crystalline lattice into solution. An example of a nonionic solute is table sugar. The water dipoles make hydrogen bonds with the polar regions of the sugar molecule (OH groups) and allow it to be carried away into solution.

Quantum tunneling


The quantum tunneling dynamics in water was reported as early as 1992. At that time it was known that there are motions which destroy and regenerate the weak hydrogen bond by internal rotations of the substituent water monomers.[64] On 18 March 2016, it was reported that the hydrogen bond can be broken by quantum tunneling in the water hexamer. Unlike previously reported tunneling motions in water, this involved the concerted breaking of two hydrogen bonds.[65] Later in the same year, the discovery of the quantum tunneling of water molecules was reported.[66]

Electromagnetic absorption


Water is relatively transparent to visible light, near ultraviolet light, and far-red light, but it absorbs most ultraviolet light, infrared light, and microwaves. Most photoreceptors and photosynthetic pigments utilize the portion of the light spectrum that is transmitted well through water. Microwave ovens take advantage of water's opacity to microwave radiation to heat the water inside of foods. Water's light blue colour is caused by weak absorption in the red part of the visible spectrum.[3][67]

Structure


A single water molecule can participate in a maximum of four hydrogen bonds because it can accept two bonds using the lone pairs on oxygen and donate two hydrogen atoms. Other molecules like hydrogen fluoride, ammonia and methanol can also form hydrogen bonds. However, they do not show anomalous thermodynamic, kinetic or structural properties like those observed in water because none of them can form four hydrogen bonds: either they cannot donate or accept hydrogen atoms, or there are steric effects in bulky residues. 
In water, intermolecular tetrahedral structures form due to the four hydrogen bonds, thereby forming an open structure and a three-dimensional bonding network, resulting in the anomalous decrease in density when cooled below 4 °C. This repeated, constantly reorganizing unit defines a three-dimensional network extending throughout the liquid. This view is based upon neutron scattering studies and computer simulations, and it makes sense in the light of the unambiguously tetrahedral arrangement of water molecules in ice structures.
However, there is an alternative theory for the structure of water. In 2004, a controversial paper from Stockholm Universitysuggested that water molecules in liquid form typically bind not to four but to only two others; thus forming chains and rings. The term "string theory of water" (which is not to be confused with the string theory of physics) was coined. These observations were based upon X-ray absorption spectroscopy that probed the local environment of individual oxygen atoms.[68]

Chemical properties

At standard conditions, water is a polar liquid that slightly dissociates disproportionately into a hydronium ion and hydroxide ion. . . .

The ionic product of pure water,Kw has a value of about 10−14 at 25 °C; see data page for values at other temperatures. Pure water has a concentration of the hydroxide ion (OH
) equal to that of the hydrogen ion (H+
), which gives a pH of 7 at 25 °C.[69]

Geochemistry

Action of water on rock over long periods of time typically leads to weathering and water erosion, physical processes that convert solid rocks and minerals into soil and sediment, but under some conditions chemical reactions with water occur as well, resulting in metasomatism or mineral hydration, a type of chemical alteration of a rock which produces clay minerals. It also occurs when Portland cement hardens.
Water ice can form clathrate compounds, known as clathrate hydrates, with a variety of small molecules that can be embedded in its spacious crystal lattice. The most notable of these is methane clathrate, 4 CH
4·23H
2O, naturally found in large quantities on the ocean floor.

Acidity in nature

Rain is generally mildly acidic, with a pH between 5.2 and 5.8 if not having any acid stronger than carbon dioxide.[70] If high amounts of nitrogen and sulfur oxides are present in the air, they too will dissolve into the cloud and rain drops, producing acid rain.

Isotopologues

Several isotopes of both hydrogen and oxygen exist, giving rise to several known isotopologues of water. Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water is the current international standard for water isotopes. . . .
Deuterium oxide, D
2O, is also known as heavy water because of its higher density. It is used in nuclear reactors as a neutron moderator. Tritium is radioactive, decaying with a half-life of 4500 days; THO exists in nature only in minute quantities, being produced primarily via cosmic ray-induced nuclear reactions in the atmosphere. Water with one protium and one deuterium atom HDO occurs naturally in ordinary water in low concentrations (~0.03%) and D
2O in far lower amounts (0.000003%) and any such molecules are temporary as the atoms recombine.
The most notable physical differences between H
2O and D
2O, other than the simple difference in specific mass, involve properties that are affected by hydrogen bonding, such as freezing and boiling, and other kinetic effects. This is because the nucleus of deuterium is twice as heavy as protium, and this causes noticeable differences in bonding energies. The difference in boiling points allows the isotopologues to be separated. The self-diffusion coefficient of H
2O at 25 °C is 23% higher than the value of D
2O.[72] Because water molecules exchange hydrogen atoms with one another, hydrogen deuterium oxide (DOH) is much more common in low-purity heavy water than pure dideuterium monoxide D
2O
Consumption of pure isolated D
2O may affect biochemical processes – ingestion of large amounts impairs kidney and central nervous system function. Small quantities can be consumed without any ill-effects; humans are generally unaware of taste differences,[73] but sometimes report a burning sensation[74] or sweet flavor.[75] Very large amounts of heavy water must be consumed for any toxicity to become apparent. Rats, however, are able to avoid heavy water by smell, and it is toxic to many animals.[76]
Light water refers to deuterium-depleted water (DDW), water in which the deuterium content has been reduced below the standard 155 ppm level.

Occurrence

It is the most abundant substance on Earth and also the third most abundant molecule in the universe, after H
2 and CO.[21] 0.23 ppm of the earth's mass is water and 97.39% of the global water volume of 1.38×109 km3 is found in the oceans.[77]

Reactions

Acid-base reactions

Water is amphoteric: it has the ability to act as either an acid or a base in chemical reactions.[78] According to the Brønsted-Lowry definition, an acid is a proton (H+
) donor and a base is a proton acceptor.[79] When reacting with a stronger acid, water acts as a base; when reacting with a stronger base, it acts as an acid.[79] . . . 

Because the oxygen atom in water has two lone pairs, water often acts as a Lewis base, or electron pair donor, in reactions with Lewis acids, although it can also react with Lewis bases, forming hydrogen bonds between the electron pair donors and the hydrogen atoms of water. HSAB theory describes water as both a weak hard acid and a weak hard base, meaning that it reacts preferentially with other hard species: . . .

When a salt of a weak acid or of a weak base is dissolved in water, water can partially hydrolyze the salt, producing the corresponding base or acid, which gives aqueous solutions of soap and baking soda their basic pH: . . .

Ligand chemistry

Water's Lewis base character makes it a common ligand in transition metal complexes, examples of which include metal aquo complexes such as Fe(H
2O)2+
6 to perrhenic acid, which contains two water molecules coordinated to a rhenium center. In solid hydrates, water can be either a ligand or simply lodged in the framework, or both. Thus, FeSO
4·7H
2O
 consists of [Fe2(H2O)6]2+centers and one "lattice water". Water is typically a monodentate ligand, i.e., it forms only one bond with the central atom.[80]

Organic chemistry

As a hard base, water reacts readily with organic carbocations; for example in a hydration reaction, a hydroxyl group (OH
) and an acidic proton are added to the two carbon atoms bonded together in the carbon-carbon double bond, resulting in an alcohol. When addition of water to an organic molecule cleaves the molecule in two, hydrolysis is said to occur. Notable examples of hydrolysis are the saponification of fats and the digestion of proteins and polysaccharides. Water can also be a leaving group in SN2 substitution and E2 elimination reactions; the latter is then known as a dehydration reaction.

Water in redox reactions

Water contains hydrogen in the oxidation state +1 and oxygen in the oxidation state −2.[81] It oxidizes chemicals such as hydrides, alkali metals, and some alkaline earth metals.[82][83] 

Some other reactive metals, such as aluminum and beryllium, are oxidized by water as well, but their oxides adhere to the metal and form a passive protective layer.[85] Note that the rusting of iron is a reaction between iron and oxygen[86] that is dissolved in water, not between iron and water.
Water can be oxidized to emit oxygen gas, but very few oxidants react with water even if their reduction potential is greater than the potential of O
2/H
2O. Almost all such reactions require a catalyst.[87] 

2

Electrolysis


Water can be split into its constituent elements, hydrogen and oxygen, by passing an electric current through it.[88] This process is called electrolysis. . . 

The gases produced bubble to the surface, where they can be collected or ignited with a flame above the water if this was the intention. The required potential for the electrolysis of pure water is 1.23 V at 25 °C.[88] The operating potential is actually 1.48 V or higher in practical electrolysis.

History

Henry Cavendish showed that water was composed of oxygen and hydrogen in 1781.[89] The first decomposition of water into hydrogen and oxygen, by electrolysis, was done in 1800 by English chemist William Nicholson and Anthony Carlisle.[89][90] In 1805, Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac and Alexander von Humboldt showed that water is composed of two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen.[91]
Gilbert Newton Lewis isolated the first sample of pure heavy water in 1933.[92]
The properties of water have historically been used to define various temperature scales. Notably, the Kelvin, Celsius, Rankine, and Fahrenheit scales were, or currently are, defined by the freezing and boiling points of water. The less common scales of Delisle, Newton, Réaumur and Rømer were defined similarly. The triple point of water is a more commonly used standard point today.

Nomenclature

The accepted IUPAC name of water is oxidane or simply water,[93] or its equivalent in different languages, although there are other systematic names which can be used to describe the molecule. Oxidane is only intended to be used as the name of the mononuclear parent hydride used for naming derivatives of water by substituent nomenclature.[94] These derivatives commonly have other recommended names. For example, the name hydroxyl is recommended over oxidanyl for the –OH group. The name oxane is explicitly mentioned by the IUPAC as being unsuitable for this purpose, since it is already the name of a cyclic ether also known as tetrahydropyran.[95][96]
The simplest systematic name of water is hydrogen oxide. This is analogous to related compounds such as hydrogen peroxide, hydrogen sulfide, and deuterium oxide (heavy water). Using chemical nomenclature for type I ionic binary compounds, water would take the name hydrogen monoxide ,[97] but this is not among the names published by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC).[93] Another name is dihydrogen monoxide, which is a rarely used name of water, and mostly used in the dihydrogen monoxide hoax.
Other systematic names for water include hydroxic acid, hydroxylic acid, and hydrogen hydroxide, using acid and base names.[h]None of these exotic names are used widely. The polarized form of the water molecule, H+
OH
, is also called hydron hydroxide by IUPAC nomenclature.[98]
Water substance is a term used for hydrogen oxide (H2O) when one does not wish to specify whether one is speaking of liquid water, steam, some form of ice, or a component in a mixture or mineral.

Selected and edited from Wikipedia - Properties of Water

** **

       Upon reading the above article I learned material I did not know or realize about the properties of water. One of the most intriguing properties to me is:

** **

Quantum tunneling


The quantum tunneling dynamics in water was reported as early as 1992. At that time it was known that there are motions which destroy and regenerate the weak hydrogen bond by internal rotations of the substituent water monomers.[64] On 18 March 2016, it was reported that the hydrogen bond can be broken by quantum tunneling in the water hexamer. Unlike previously reported tunneling motions in water, this involved the concerted breaking of two hydrogen bonds.[65] Later in the same year, the discovery of the quantum tunneling of water molecules was reported.[66]

** **

Quantum tunneling is a mystery by definition as far as I am concerned. I suppose it isn't metaphorically equivalent to transcendentalism in context. 


       I see how it might be to you, boy. You can take metaphors and analogies too far. Enough for tonight. Your electric power has been out since 2058 hours. It is now 2221. Power up your phone. Drop this in the blog and post. - Amorella

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

65. Notes - not paying attention


65. Notes -26 November 2019

       Mid-afternoon. Tom S. (M/I supervisor) is here with two workers ready to install the cutout plasterboard to the ceiling for repairs to a three-board heavy truss about three feet tall, each board about an inch and a half thick. You think the reengineering is very cool as they are putting a new piece of plasterboard in its place. Tomorrow they will redo the decorative white ceiling plaster-paint. They plastic covered everything to keep the dust at an absolute minimum. Around four you and Carol are driving up to Tiffin to pick up Carol's sister Linda from Patti's house. The two should be there around five just returning from their week tour of Iceland. - Amorella

       1528 hours. Busy day today. It was neat watching them repair that huge truss. A few weeks ago, the ceiling developed a quarter inch crack all the way across from east to west because the north facing truss board slightly warped out. M/I Home engineers came to the rescue plan and have changed the design so this will not happen to future houses with this house plan (we had added a bedroom and bath upstairs). New twenty-year plus warranty will be in place. I'm sure it will be stable. Just a fluke in three other new houses just like ours. All such houses were fixable. I love how M/I takes care of things. We were happy with our first house (1992) with them in Mason which is the reason we bought again. 

       Post. - Amorella

       1540 hours. But we haven't focused on the human spirit yet. 

       You have, but you were not paying any attention. - Amorella

Monday, February 25, 2019

64. Notes - MH's thoughts


64. 25 February 2019

       Evening. This is Miss Havisham. First, a little enlightenment. I am going to review your chapter one, book one as a soul might. Your characters are central to the story not the plot. The characters are equal in the sense they are 'living' in a fiction, much as you humans are living on a planet. We have three general life settings, a past, a present and a future.

       2151 hours. Interesting. I thought the characters might be central but I did not consider the plot not to be so relevant. You can't have a good story without a plot. I don't know that this is fair that you consider the story from your perspective. I didn't write it for my soul I wrote it over my sense of human worth and dignity. 

       In here that includes your soul as well as heart and mind.- mh

       2202 hours. Your chapter reviews then suggest how I could write not just focusing on the human heart and mind as much, but by focusing on a balanced piece that includes the soul in the greater dramatic theatre, like the works of Sophocles and Shakespeare do. If so, you are writing to produce far beyond my humble station. 

       You miss my point, Mr. Orndorff. I want to broaden your sense of what the soul considers important. It starts with one's character, herorhis real persona, the heartansoulanmind, the immortal-like stuffing of nothing material that you take with you when you leave this physical place. mh 

       2216 hours. I need to adjust to this. I mean, it is interesting-in-a-sort-of-way. I don't really pay much attention to my soul part. It is more abstract and not too interesting because the soul appears to have little to do with the everyday practicalities of life. 

       Post. - Amorella

Sunday, February 24, 2019

63. Notes - easier to accept the fiction


63. 24 February 2019

       Sunday evening. When thinking with your soul, intensity beyond the heart comes to mind first, then an esoteric sense of passion beyond the physical level, usually a heartfelt passion about something or someone and an intimate empathy is involved. That's the mix: soulfully deep intensity and empathetically heartfelt passion concerning a person or a people or an idea or a concept such as to evoke humility or anger without a consciously predisposed premeditation. - Amorella

       2135 hours. This is a mix of heartansoulanmind, a human spiritual mix. I do not understand how I can write from my soul's perspective on this blog. I am as is almost everyone else, a mixable unconsciousness of the heartansoulanmind at any moment. Thoughtless and thoughtful weather-like passions of intellect and emotions attempt to rule the next conscious moment. A person must consciously raise the soul up or drop its sense of worth to a lesser level. This is what comes to mind. Under the law some people are guilty of premeditate murder and some people are not. This is also why some people become saint-like and others not. 

       You have nothing else to say. - Amorella

       2201 hours. I like the idea that my soul can take on the persona of Miss Havisham to critique the clarified drafts of the novels, but I cannot really imagine her doing so.

       Perhaps if I continue to play her part as suggested earlier, this will be easier for you to accept fictionally. - Amorella

       2206 hours. It is true, you did write her persona would come through you. Even the underlining in italic Arial print show a direct connection to your own without the underlining. 

       I move at your speed, boy, and at your will. You, heartansoulanmind, are free in this world and the spiritual in this blog, otherwise where would be your humanity? Post. - Amorella

Saturday, February 23, 2019

62. Notes - among rather than between


62. 23 February 2019
       
       Saturday evening. Earlier today you discovered an article within "Science Alert" online that shows a new theory on how the universe is a product of quantum mechanics. You find it interesting in that it may be useful as an analogy in terms of the 'human spiritual world' of heartansoulanmind. 
                                                                   


** **

Science Alert 

Exclusive: This Wild Paper Suggests Our Reality Is Just a Product of Quantum Mechanics 

By

FIONA MACDONALD 
22 FEB 2019 

A team of theoretical physicists has a mind-bending new explanation for why our Universe is the way it is, and how it emerged in all its strangeness.
According to a recent paper, space-time itself - the very fabric that makes up our Universe - is nothing more than a product of quantum mechanics. And distortions in this quantum 'weirdness' can explain why strange phenomena such as entanglement and quantum tunnelling arise.
It sounds pretty out there, but the idea is actually built upon several previous hypotheses. In fact, it could fundamentally link the two biggest theories in physics - general relativity and quantum mechanics.
Which means we would finally get the much-desired quantum gravity 'theory of everything' that physicists have been lusting after for decades.
"If one accepts that gravitational phenomena like the formation of planetary systems, galaxies or even black holes, have the very same origin as entanglement and the tunnel effect - indeed that gravity is quantum - then a unification between quantum physics and gravity may be at reach," one of the researchers behind the study, Paulo Castro from the University of Lisbon in Portugal, told Science Alert in an exclusive interview.
But before we get ahead of ourselves, let's break down what's going on here.
For anyone who's ever laid awake at 3 am wondering what the Universe is actually made of, you are probably aware that the answer, to the best of our knowledge, is space-time.
Space-time is the strange fabric that merges the three dimensions of space and the one dimension of time we experience in our reality, and turns it into the theoretical backdrop of the Universe.
To put it in a less ethereal way, when gravitational waves ripple out from a massive collision of black holes, it's space-time they ripple through.
In fact, according to Einstein's general theory of relativity, gravity is a feature of space-time, created when its curved by massive objects such as the Sun or Earth.
So far, so good. But here's the problem. While general relativity has gravity sorted out, quantum mechanics has never been able to fully explain the force.
And that's not even mentioning the other strange phenomena that we now have evidence for but can't quite explain - such as quantum entanglement and quantum tunnelling, where information appears to travel faster than the speed of light. How do they fit in with general relativity?
That brings us back to this recent paper.
According to the new theory by Castro and his team, the origins of space-time could hold the answer. 
"In general relativity, space-time pre-exists like a tridimensional foldable substance and whatever happens in the world happens inside it," says Castro. "The possible trajectories of all objects and their velocities are determined by the way very large masses, like planets or stars, fold space-time. This is what gravity is."
"In our proposal, space-time does not pre-exist, it is the result of a physical process by which the subquantum medium goes from a chaotic state to a more organised one."
This subquantum medium is something that Castro describes as "a kind of primordial foam from where space-time itself emerges".
You could think of it like a quantum miso soup: initially it's all stirred up, and nothing can be distinguished from the chaos. But as the soup settles and becomes more 'organised', structures begin to emerge.
"In fact, in our theory, these organised states correspond to subquantum waves, imposing how space and time behaves, giving rise to extreme cases, like the ones in entanglement and the tunnel effect," says Castro.
"As space-time different behaviours are, of course, signatures of gravity, you can now say that gravity is quantum."
For now, this is all purely theoretical, but the researchers are working on ways to test their ideas.
One idea they have in mind involves the strange 'quantified' pattern seen in the placement of planets in our Solar System, which the researchers previously suggested hinted at the existence of stationary subquantum waves around our Sun.
If they could confirm that, it might help give more weight to their latest theory.
That's a long way off, but it's a pretty exciting starting point for further calculations and thought experiments.
After all, the Universe is filled with countless phenomena we can't explain - and more are added to the list frequently.
While many researchers argue that 'new physics' is needed to explain what's going on, it's comforting to think that we could make a little more sense of our reality just by rethinking and re-evaluating our existing models.
Watch this space.
The research was published in the Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics.

Selected and edited from - https://www.sciencealert.com/a-wild-new-papers-suggests-space-time-is-just-a-product-of-quantum-mechanics 


** **

       I like these paragraphs from above below. [Amorella]

** **

"In general relativity, space-time pre-exists like a tridimensional foldable substance and whatever happens in the world happens inside it," says Castro. "The possible trajectories of all objects and their velocities are determined by the way very large masses, like planets or stars, fold space-time. This is what gravity is."
"In our proposal, space-time does not pre-exist, it is the result of a physical process by which the subquantum medium goes from a chaotic state to a more organised one."
This subquantum medium is something that Castro describes as "a kind of primordial foam from where space-time itself emerges".
You could think of it like a quantum miso soup: initially it's all stirred up, and nothing can be distinguished from the chaos. But as the soup settles and becomes more 'organised', structures begin to emerge.
"In fact, in our theory, these organised states correspond to subquantum waves, imposing how space and time behaves, giving rise to extreme cases, like the ones in entanglement and the tunnel effect," says Castro.
"As space-time different behaviours are, of course, signatures of gravity, you can now say that gravity is quantum."

** **

Here is why I, the Amorella, find it interesting. Space-time exists in the material universe. It does not exist in the 'human oriented spiritual universe'. That's how it is in this blog. 

       2218 hours. So, there are no gravitational waves, black holes, space-time, quantum entanglement, quantum tunneling, speed of light or general relativity in the 'human spiritual universe', as it were. 

       As it were, boy. Yes, as it were. - Amorella

       2233 hours. In here, with souls there are relationships rather than stars and planets. That is, relationships among souls, whether heartsanminds are included or not. 

       You use 'among' rather than 'between', that is an important distinction. Post. - Amorella

Thursday, February 21, 2019

61. Notes - raw thinking concepts, analogies / logos



61. 21 February 2019

       You woke up early with a flash-vision: characters - many characters/personalities connect in the chapter and the many characters connect through the medium of characters/letters (alphabet). This is a sense of how Miss Havisham's environment works. Each personality is as a letter in the alphabet. Thus, all the personalities in the novel connect in a social construction the soul (system of souls) understands - an intricate system similar with a thought construction. Each character/person is as a noun/verb sequence to the soul. Noun/verb is as emotion/reason or heartanmind. - Amorella

       0522 hours. I awoke about 0455 thinking - soul thought environment. This communication analogy above/here (two paragraphs) deals with thought construction via a flash-vision. A human personality in the novel is as a grammatical thought construction beginning with a simple noun and verb -- a simple metaphysical mindanheart construction from a soul's perspective. The soul encases each mindansoul as a sentence. The heartansoulanmind is a sentence, a life-long and never-ending novel analogy for who knows what reasons. Biblically, "I am the Word". 

** **
(Reference to John 1:1 and John 20:30-31)

By starting out his gospel stating, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God,” John is introducing Jesus with a word or a term that both his Jewish and Gentile readers would have been familiar with. The Greek word translated “Word” in this passage is Logos, and it was common in both Greek philosophy and Jewish thought of that day. For example, in the Old Testament the “word” of God is often personified as an instrument for the execution of God’s will (Psalm 33:6; 107:20; 119:89; 147:15-18). So, for his Jewish readers, by introducing Jesus as the “Word,” John is in a sense pointing them back to the Old Testament where the Logos or “Word” of God is associated with the personification of God’s revelation. And in Greek philosophy, the term Logos was used to describe the intermediate agency by which God created material things and communicated with them. In the Greek worldview, the Logos was thought of as a bridge between the transcendent God and the material universe. Therefore, for his Greek readers the use of the term Logos would have likely brought forth the idea of a mediating principle between God and the world.

Selected from - https://www.gotquestions.org/Jesus-Word-God.html

** **

         The above is how you piece these concepts together. A spiritual/religious/cultural rational on which to base a fictional analogy construction. Such is your natural bent, your humor - a fictional construction of a heartansoulanmind in the three-dimensional physical construction with the material body being as a shell (a protector-wall) like the soul is as a shell (protector-wall) for the heartanmind. - Amorella

         0553 hours. Thank you, Amorella for better construction of my raw thinking concepts and analogies. 

       Post. - Amorella



       Morning. You are waiting for Ann F. across from the Bethany United Church of Christ off I-71 and SR. 123 not too far from the new Flying J gas station on the east side of the freeway. - Amorella

       1047 hours. I re-read the above and though a couple of errors in grammar it is understandable and not so crazing sounding as I might have imagined. Ann is running late so eventually we'll have to go on so Carol can meet with Morata and I can meet with Bud. 


         Evening. Carol did have lunch with Morata and you had lunch with Bud. Tonight, you watched a 'Midsomer Murders' and 'Rachel Maddow'. 

         2253 hours. I need to place a definition of 'logos' here in reference to the 'Got Questions' piece above. 

** **

Logos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Logos (UK: /ˈloʊɡɒs, ˈlɒɡɒs/, US: /ˈloʊɡoʊs/; Ancient Greek: λόγος, translit. lógos; from λέγω, légō, lit. 'I say') is a term in Western philosophy, psychology, rhetoric, and religionderived from a Greek word variously meaning "ground", "plea", "opinion", "expectation", "word", "speech", "account", "reason", "proportion", and "discourse".[1[2] ]It became a technical term in Western philosophy beginning with Heraclitus (c.  535 – c.  475 BC), who used the term for a principle of order and knowledge.[3] Logos is the logic behind an argument.[4] Logos tries to persuade an audience using logical arguments and supportive evidence. Logos is a persuasive technique often used in writing and rhetoric.

Ancient Greek philosophy


Stoics

Stoic philosophy began with Zeno of Citium c. 300 BC, in which the logos was the active reason pervading and animating the Universe. It was conceived as material and is usually identified with God or Nature. The Stoics also referred to the seminal logos("logos spermatikos"), or the law of generation in the Universe, which was the principle of the active reason working in inanimate matter. Humans, too, each possess a portion of the divine logos.[29]
The Stoics took all activity to imply a logos or spiritual principle. As the operative principle of the world, the logos was anima mundi to them, a concept which later influenced Philo of Alexandria, although he derived the contents of the term from Plato.[30]In his Introduction to the 1964 edition of Marcus Aurelius' Meditations, the Anglican priest Maxwell Staniforth wrote that "Logos ... had long been one of the leading terms of Stoicism, chosen originally for the purpose of explaining how deity came into relation with the universe".[31]

In Hellenistic Judaism

 

Philo of Alexandria

Philo (c. 20 BC – c. 50 AD), a Hellenized Jew, used the term Logos to mean an intermediary divine being or demiurge.[7] Philo followed the Platonic distinction between imperfect matter and perfect Form, and therefore intermediary beings were necessary to bridge the enormous gap between God and the material world.[33] The Logos was the highest of these intermediary beings, and was called by Philo "the first-born of God".[33] Philo also wrote that "the Logos of the living God is the bond of everything, holding all things together and binding all the parts, and prevents them from being dissolved and separated".[34]
Plato's Theory of Forms was located within the Logos, but the Logos also acted on behalf of God in the physical world.[33] In particular, the Angel of the Lord in the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) was identified with the Logos by Philo, who also said that the Logos was God's instrument in the creation of the Universe.[33]

Christianity

In Christology, the Logos (Greek: Λόγος, lit. ''Word", "Discourse", or "Reason'')[35] is a name or title of Jesus Christ, seen as the pre-existent second person of the Trinity. The concept derives from John 1:1, which in the Douay–Rheims, King James, New International, and other versions of the Bible, reads:
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Islam


The concept of the logos also exists in Islam, where it was definitively articulated primarily in the writings of the classical Sunnimystics and Islamic philosophers, as well as by certain Shi'a thinkers, during the Islamic Golden Age.[70][71] In Sunni Islam, the concept of the logos has been given many different names by the denomination's metaphysicians, mystics, and philosophers, including ʿaql ("Intellect"), al-insān al-kāmil ("Universal Man"), kalimat Allāh ("Word of God"), haqīqa muḥammadiyya ("The Muhammadan Reality"), and nūr muḥammadī ("The Muhammadan Light").

Jung's analytical psychology


Carl Jung contrasted the critical and rational faculties of logos with the emotional, non-reason oriented and mythical elements of eros.[81] In Jung's approach, logos vs eros can be represented as "science vs mysticism", or "reason vs imagination" or "conscious activity vs the unconscious".[82]
For Jung, logos represented the masculine principle of rationality, in contrast to its female counterpart, eros:
Woman’s psychology is founded on the principle of Eros, the great binder and loosener, whereas from ancient times the ruling principle ascribed to man is Logos. The concept of Eros could be expressed in modern terms as psychic relatedness, and that of Logos as objective interest.[83]
Jung attempted to equate logos and eros, his intuitive conceptions of masculine and feminine consciousness, with the alchemical Sol and Luna. Jung commented that in a man the lunar anima and in a woman the solar animus has the greatest influence on consciousness.[84] Jung often proceeded to analyze situations in terms of "paired opposites", e.g. by using the analogy with the eastern yin and yang[85] and was also influenced by the Neoplatonists.[86]
In his book Mysterium Coniunctionis Jung made some important final remarks about anima and animus:
In so far as the spirit is also a kind of "window on eternity"... it conveys to the soul a certain influx divinus... and the knowledge of a higher system of the world, wherein consists precisely its supposed animation of the soul.
And in this book Jung again emphasized that the animus compensates eros, while the anima compensates logos.[87]

Selected and edited from Wikipedia - Logos

** **

         The 'logos' selections you chose give you a variety of ways the word may be understood. - Amorella

         2320 hours. True to my nature the one definition that I feel intuitive greets my own is that of the Stoics.

** **

Stoics

Stoic philosophy began with Zeno of Citium c. 300 BC, in which the logos was the active reason pervading and animating the Universe. It was conceived as material and is usually identified with God or Nature. The Stoics also referred to the seminal logos("logos spermatikos"), or the law of generation in the Universe, which was the principle of the active reason working in inanimate matter. Humans, too, each possess a portion of the divine logos.
The Stoics took all activity to imply a logos or spiritual principle. As the operative principle of the world, the logos was anima mundi to them, a concept which later influenced Philo of Alexandria, although he derived the contents of the term from Plato.In his Introduction to the 1964 edition of Marcus Aurelius' Meditations, the Anglican priest Maxwell Staniforth wrote that "Logos ... had long been one of the leading terms of Stoicism, chosen originally for the purpose of explaining how deity came into relation with the universe".

** **
       2326 hours. First, what comes to mind is this. 'Logos is the spiritual principle' also within the individual's heartansoulanmind, the human spirit. Second, the sentences immediately above are only intuitional imagination with no scientific validity. 

       Post. - Amorella