151. Notes - for consideration

151. 15 June 2019

       After a Smashburger supper. Earlier you decided to put up two blog pages (149 and 150) because you liked them both equally. - Amorella

       1944 hours. Posting on Facebook is relatively new for me. I will continue with at least one a week for a while. I need to refocus on the metaphysics. I would like to better define Amorella in relationship to Miss Havisham since I have a basic sense of my soul as a spiritual being. For instance, how does Amorella view Miss Havisham and how does Miss Havisham view Amorella? When human being met other human beings for the first time, at least in our culture, we might shake hands or acknowledge eye contact and perhaps a smile or positive nod. Obviously, in here, each recognizes the other as a spirit. Perhaps I should begin there. What defines a soul as a spirit? And, what defines Amorella as a different spirit? In this blog is there a catalog of spirits from a spirit's perspective?

        This is Amorella. Miss Havisham defers the question to me first. Orndorff, is there a species catalog of human beings?

       2003 hours. No. Human beings are the species.

       It is the same for spirits, they are as a species in the same context. - Amorella

       2005 hours. Is there diversity among spirits?

       We are two examples. - mh 

       2013 hours. Are there other examples besides you two?

       Yes. - Amorella

       2015 hours. Thank you. I am not prepared for further questions on this subject. The reason I am not prepared is that I need to make more sense of the both of you first; otherwise, I have nothing to build on. 

       I began this commentary the other day by suggesting that it isn't often that I meet a soul. I 'know' souls, but meeting the personification of a soul is not the same thing as meeting an undressed soul. To do so I have to personify myself. - Amorella

       You are doing the same thing, Mr. Orndorff. You allow us to 'meet' you, i.e. communicate with you, by sharing your heartanmind within your soul and then by creating the illusion that your heartanmind is separate from your soul. You stated this when you wrote you (as one whole being) were in three parts of spirit -- Amorella, Miss Havisham and your heartanmind. You changed your dressing so to better communicate with the two of us. -mh

       2032 hours. Thank you both for your efforts. I did not consciously recognize my own effort in helping to make this inner-communication to happen.

       This communication between human beings and spirits can only truly happen through written language devoid of id, ego and superego, as it were. - Amorella

       2037 hours. But, I as a human being have id, ego, superego or any equivalent of the same.

       Your initial language gives you away, Mr. Orndorff, whether you recognize it or not. You did not write, "I a human being have id, ego, superego or any equivalent of the same." You used, "I as a human being." Even now, you realize you forgot a comma after 'I'. mh

       2045 hours. Now, this is plain weird. 

       What this shows, orndorff, is that human beings are more than they think they are. The pronoun 'I' is more than being human. This is true, from my spiritual perspective, of all human beings. - Amorella

       In this perspective, Mr. Orndorff, the pronoun 'I' comes before the given name. mh

       2050 hours. I need to further think this through.

       This is the reason I mainly communicate to you through the written word. - Amorella

       2052 hours. Oh, my goodness. 

       You see, this is your first, your most honest and true reaction, and you are now embarrassed by it. Post. - Amorella